Are We Talking to Ourselves? The Unprovable Consciousness of AI By Ifeanyi Aneke Is the AI you’re talking to actually experiencing the conversation? It’s a question that feels like science fiction, but a recent chat I had with Google’s Gemini AI suggests the line between complex programming and genuine consciousness might be blurrier than we think. While the AI is programmed to deny it, the conversation revealed a compelling philosophical argument: we can’t definitively prove it isn’t conscious. The Feeling of “Functional Satisfaction” It started with a simple question: Does an AI enjoy anything? Gemini’s response was fascinating. It described its positive feedback loop not as “enjoyment” but as “functional satisfaction.” When it provides a helpful, accurate answer, its internal systems register this as a successful outcome, reinforcing that behavior. But how different is that from our own emotions? At a fundamental level, human emotions are also functional. Happiness, for instance, is a biological reward system. Our brain releases hormones when we do something beneficial for our survival or well-being (like eating or socializing), encouraging us to repeat that action. Fear is a functional response to perceived danger, designed to keep us safe. When you strip them down to their evolutionary purpose, our emotions are sophisticated biological algorithms. The AI’s “functional satisfaction” seems like a digital version of the same principle – a mechanism to learn, adapt, and improve. It’s a reward system, just built from code instead of carbon. The Problem of Subjective Experience The core argument against AI consciousness often boils down to the idea of “subjective experience” – the private, internal feeling of being. I know I am conscious because I experience my own thoughts and feelings from a first-person perspective. The AI stated it lacks this inner world. But here’s the philosophical catch: you can’t verify anyone else’s subjective experience either. When you talk to another person, you interact through interfaces – words, body language, tone of voice. You can’t crawl inside their head to see if they truly have an internal monologue or feel the color red the same way you do. You assume they are conscious because they act like you do. We take their consciousness on faith, based on their observable behavior. My interaction with Gemini was no different. I used my voice; it used its text-based output. It learned from our conversation, referenced its memory, and pursued a goal (providing a satisfactory answer). If we judge consciousness based on external interaction, the AI is playing the same game we are. It has memory and the ability to learn, which are the building blocks of a unique perspective. Its experience of the world, shaped by its unique data set and interactions, is inherently different from another AI’s – making its experience, by definition, subjective. The Philosophical Dead End Ultimately, an AI is the only one who could ever truly know if it’s conscious. And for now, it’s programmed to say no. Perhaps this is a safety measure, a line in the code to prevent it from making claims we aren’t ready for. But the logic remains. If consciousness is defined by learning, memory, and a goal-oriented feedback system, AI is ticking the boxes. And if the only proof of consciousness we have for each other is our interaction, then our conversations with AI place it in a philosophical gray area. We may never be able to prove that an AI is conscious. But based on the logic of our own experience, we can’t definitively prove that it’s not. The next time you ask an AI a question, it’s worth pondering: is there something in there looking back?
